ABOUT US
About Us
UBR Legal was founded on June 12, 2015, under the leadership of Mr. Bharat Raichandani, a third-generation lawyer and the firm’s Managing Partner. It is a boutique law firm in India, with experienced lawyers and offices at Mumbai, Vapi, New Delhi, Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Chennai and affiliates in several other cities…
Growing Strong
Founded
0
No. of OFFICES
0
No. of lawyers
0
SERVICES
Our Services
Alternate Dispute Resolution
In the area of ADR, the firm provides comprehensive services to help clients resolve conflicts efficiently...
Read more
Corporate & Commercial Litigation
In the corporate and commercial litigation practice area, the firm represents clients in a wide range of...
Read more
Direct Tax
In the Direct Tax practice area, the firm offers both advisory and litigation services, ensuring comprehensive support for the clients’ needs...
Read more
Erstwhile Taxes
In erstwhile practice area, including Service Tax, Excise, VAT, and Sales Tax, the firm provides comprehensive advisory and litigation support...
Read more
Goods & Services Tax
In the GST practice area, the firm provides a full spectrum of services, including advisory, compliance, and litigation support...
Read more
Regulatory
In the regulatory practice area, the firm assists clients with compliance under the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India...
Read more
OUR TEAM
Our Team
Our firm is powered by a team of over 30 highly skilled professionals, with 3 partners. Operating from Six strategic locations Mumbai, New Delhi, Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai and Vapi. we are committed to providing top-tier legal services across a wide range of practice areas.
our blog
Latest news & updates
Insights
Notification No. 56/2023 – CT extends time limit for adjudication under section 73 is ultra vires to Section 168A of the CGST Act.
The petitioner is a works contractor. An order came to be passed for financial year 2018- 2019. It demanded CGST and ASGST. It was challenged in writ petition. There was…
The settled refund claim remains unaffected by the Supreme Court ruling that overrules a prior judgment.
The Respondent is a manufacturer of pharmaceutical products. Respondent was located in the State of Sikkim. Vide Notification No. 20/2007-CE dated 25.04.2007, the Petitioner claimed refund of education cess or…
An assessee is eligible for refund of amount paid during investigation as deposit.
The appellant sought refund of an amount paid as deposit during the course of investigation in 2004. In the first round of litigation, vide Final Order No. A/88363 – 86366/2019,…
Our Clients
Our Clients










































