The petitioner provided services of preparation of a Detailed Project Report for the purpose of development of the Metro Rail Project for the City of Surat, Gujarat. The said service was exempt from GST. However, the petitioner paid GST on the same under 'mistake of law. The payment was made in August 2017. The petitioner…

The petitioner is a former director of a company. He had resigned. His account came to be attached under Section 83 of the CGST Act by the State Tax Officer for alleged pending dues of the company. The attachment was challenged by way of writ. It was contended that attachment under section 83 can be…

The petitioner was selling areca nuts from Karnataka to customers based in Delhi. The conveyance was intercepted, and proceedings under section 129 were initiated on the basis that there was no E-way Bill. However, the confiscation order came to be passed under section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017, on the ground that the goods…

The petitioner is a works contractor. Refund claims were filed. Refund orders were passed against the petitioner. Appeals were filed before appellate authority. The appellate authority allowed the appeals (partly in some cases). However, form APL-04 was either not uploaded online or the incorrect form was uploaded. Due to which, the original authority did not…

The appellant is a dealer. It purchases heavy vehicles from Tata Motors and cars from Hyundai Motors. The said vehicles are sold to customers. A demand of service tax of over Rs.33 crores was raised on the appellant on the ground:The discount/incentive offered by the manufacturer by way of various schemes is consideration for providing…

The appellant constructed a mall. It availed credit of tax paid on input services. The Commissioner disallowed such input credit on the ground that it is not "input service" as defined under Rule 2 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The appellant deposited the amount "under protest." The appeal filed against this order is allowed by the…